"There are boundless benefits to endorsing [the commission's] proposal of transforming assessment to render it for education so as to inform and guide daily progress in learning and development, supporting education's primary learning and teaching processes with richer pedagogies informed by the learning sciences," he [Roy Pea] said in a statement.
They
are looking for “richer pedagogies” Here’s the problem. Children (and every one else) learn best when
they fall in love with a subject area and try to learn everything they can
about it. I doubt that figuring out if children have
acquired a love of learning is part of this testing protocol.
I had a student once who feel in love with physics in junior
high. He spent the next three years
trying to read all different kinds of physics books. By high school he was
doing independent studies in physics, and then went on to Harvard. My eight-year-old grandson loves sports
statistics, and can give me informed commentary on the various teams chances
for winning. And he’s eight!
We need some kind of discussion of how to help children love
learning. I don’t think all of this
emphasis on testing and common core curriculum is helping.
No comments:
Post a Comment